I know exactly what I'm talking about. I'm saying the foreground and background are the same, therefore the camera hasn't moved.
Nope. Originally you said your reason for believing the camera had not moved was the identical backgrounds. Now you're changing your story based on feedback you've received.
The large dark hole in the left foreground, using parallax, indicates that the camera is pointed maybe half a degree off between the two.
Parallax has nothing to do with camera
orientation. It is strictly a product of camera
location. If there was previously any doubt whether you understood parallax, your claim to determine "using parallax" a different in camera orientation removed it. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Yes, we know you're just cribbing all these claims from Aulis. What you have to realize is that none of what appears on Aulis is taken seriously by the professional photographic analysis community, and that the Aulis authors have many times refused to face anyone in open debate over their findings.