The guy is just about as nutty as they come. You'll go a long way before you'll see a more comprehensive collection of logical fallacies than this.
That would be saying a lot!
What gets me is how unconcerned these people seem to be that they're attacking a
caricature of evolution with a
caricature of the second law of thermodynamics -- and of every other "law" of physics they abuse.
It's amusing that creationists think enough of science -- or more accurately, are sufficiently envious of the reputation that modern science has earned -- to accuse scientists of somehow being the "unscientific" ones. They'll say with a perfectly straight face that modern science actually confirms
everything in the bible. Carbon dating, "properly used", proves the earth is young, and so on and on.
These attacks wouldn't be so dangerous if more people understood what evolution actually says and how the scientific method actually works. But that's why it's called pseudoscience; the resemblance to real science is purely superficial.
I haven't been able to get this guy to answer the one question I always try to ask every creationist: You seem quite upset at what you perceive as human arrogance toward god, so exactly who are
you to tell
him how he can or can't run his own universe? If he wants to make evolution his method of creating, who are you to tell him he can't? This guy won't even acknowledge the question; maybe he's smarter than he looks.
