1-5 are out of the question because according to Burns the "embargo" ended with Armstrong's death. Hence Armstrong was allowed to tell Burns everything and Burns was allowed to publish it. So no excuse is valid if it boils down to NASA resuming its alleged strong-arm tactics to keep the secret.
6 could happen, but in Burns' particular ... (idiom, sir?) ... yes, idiom, he'll invent some ghost visit or time-travel episode for his deus ex machina explanation of how "properly" to interpret Aldrin's statements.
He'll either do a
stealth flounce or just plain ignore the fact that there will be no "confession". After all, both Burns and his paramour Septic_UK have a habit of ignoring questions (which is why I personally think that all they are doing is trolling).
Hey, Burns...are you passing up on the
chance to make a quick £1000???. D'ya see, the problem that you have made for yourself is that you've made a
prediction and set a date for it. The second mistake is that you've set the date so close that anyone that reads this thread will remember it. Unless a wormhole opens up and an Aldrin from an alternative Universe (one where the Moon landings were faked) drops into a Sky studio, then there is zero chance of any confession tomorrow. You should learn from the loons that are Jehova's Witnesses...they had an unhappy knack of predicting the end of the World and
getting it wrong. They eventually learned to say that the World will end "soon". Nice and nebulous and easy to swallow for the hard-of-thinking.
