I'll leave the debunking of the pseudoscience/engineering in this gem of an article to our resident experts...
There really isn't much to debunk. First, the design and operation of the lunar module according to ordinary principles of rocketry is well established and well documented, and has contributed extensively to ongoing space engineering. Proposing it to be an elaborate ruse belies that it would have to be a
very elaborate ruse -- so elaborate, in fact, that it would have worked as advertised, and is believed and consulted by every practicing space engineer out there. The 3,500-lbf Aerojet ascent motor that this author says
wasn't used managed to work as an upper-stage motor in launch vehicles well into the 1980s. The guidance system he said
wasn't installed (covering for a 200-year-old electrostatic generator design) managed to operate a U.S. military jet well into the 1970s.
Second, the scenario proposed is pure technobabble. It alludes to a few principles in high-voltage physics, but provides no "meat" that would necessarily come from an expert on the subject. It's clearly meant to fool laymen.
Veterans Today has a particular brand of stupid. Their
modus is to handwave a bunch of nonsense above the name of someone with nebulous or ill-fitting credentials and assert that you have to believe the "experts." This is the outfit, for example, that publishes James Fetzer's anti-Semitic rants and Dimitri Khalezov's nonsense about nukes on 9/11.