Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?

[LunarOrbit]

I think i have done fairly well in that regard thus far.

How so?

Mr Windley, if you cannot see that I have not only outmaneuvered you but outclassed you as an added bonus, you're not even as smart as I thought you were. You're acting like a jackal.

Wow, I know delusions of gradeur are common among hoax believers, but that's impressive.

Let's have a raise of hands... who here has been convinced by Romulus' argument? Nope... not a single raised hand. That's what I thought.

Let me know when you've come up with an explanation for where Neil, Buzz, and Mike were on July 20th, 1969. Then we can talk about how impressive your intellect is.

[Bob B.]

Interdimensional Warrior, I'm guessing.

Now that you mention it, he does sounds a lot like Interdimensional Warrior.

[Romulus]

As in someone who has posted here before?

As in someone who has had an account here under another name.

It is not my responsibility to do so to you.

I'm not asking for me.  The moderator may be interested, however, since multiple accounts is against the forum rules.

I have no other account. Any that I might have had at one time I do not have the password to any longer, and I don't thin k they exist anyway. If I am required to reveal information I do not wish to for the dubious "privilege" of gracing this forum with my input, I simply will not post here any longer. Fair enough?

[LunarOrbit]

the ONLY assertion I have made here with this post is that you do not respect the scientific  method and to my satisfaction I have proved that.

Impressive. Most impressive. You persuaded yourself that you were right. Good job.

I have also expressed the OPINION that I believe the Apollo  moonlandings were a hoax. It is not my responsibility to prove my opinion

If you make a claim and want it to be taken seriously, then yes, you do have to prove it. Where were Neil, Buzz, and Mike on July 20th, 1969?

[JayUtah]

No sir, but it would be wise to show a bit of respect...

Respect is earned.

...despite the fact that you have a personal interest in painting me a fool, a liar or a mental case.

Or maybe I just want you to present your case so we can see whether it holds water.

I assure you I can and will outsmart you and you probably won't realize it.

So do it already.

[Romulus]

Let's have a raise of hands... who here has been convinced by Romulus' argument? Nope... not a single raised hand. That's what I thought.

That reminded me of the 2004 Presidential election. You wouldn't be a neoCON would you?

[Romulus]

No sir, but it would be wise to show a bit of respect...

Respect is earned.

...despite the fact that you have a personal interest in painting me a fool, a liar or a mental case.

Or maybe I just want you to present your case so we can see whether it holds water.

I assure you I can and will outsmart you and you probably won't realize it.

So do it already.

I rest my case.

[JayUtah]

...I simply will not post here any longer. Fair enough?

Sure.  It's not as if you're contributing anything of value.  But if you turn tail and run, then how will the world ever know how intellectually superior you are to everyone else here?

[JayUtah]

I rest my case.

On what?  Eleven pages of chest-thumping?

[Romulus]

 Where were Neil, Buzz, and Mike on July 20th, 1969?

I could say they were drinking and smoking grass down in Mexico with me and prove it just as well as you could prove they were on the moon.

[JayUtah]

I could say they were drinking and smoking grass down in Mexico with me and prove it just as well as you could prove they were on the moon.

Then do it.

[Romulus]

...I simply will not post here any longer. Fair enough?

Sure.  It's not as if you're contributing anything of value.  But if you turn tail and run, then how will the world ever know how intellectually superior you are to everyone else here?

Mr. Windley, intelligence is not something one can imitate. And you are proof positive of that fact.

[Romulus]

I could say they were drinking and smoking grass down in Mexico with me and prove it just as well as you could prove they were on the moon.

Then do it.

I think that was the point, Mr.Windley. I can't prove it, because they weren't. And that's the same reason you can't prove they were on the moon

[LunarOrbit]

 Where were Neil, Buzz, and Mike on July 20th, 1969?

I could say they were drinking and smoking grass down in Mexico with me and prove it just as well as you could prove they were on the moon.

Yeah, because all we have is an unsubstantiated claim, right? You sure have to dismiss a whole lot of reality to believe what you believe.

[DD Brock]

As in someone who has posted here before?

As in someone who has had an account here under another name.

It is not my responsibility to do so to you.

I'm not asking for me.  The moderator may be interested, however, since multiple accounts is against the forum rules.

I have no other account. Any that I might have had at one time I do not have the password to any longer, and I don't thin k they exist anyway. If I am required to reveal information I do not wish to for the dubious "privilege" of gracing this forum with my input, I simply will not post here any longer. Fair enough?

Far be it for me to speak for anyone else here, but I'm fair sure your contributions won't be missed, one evenings entertainment notwithstanding.