Author Topic: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?  (Read 314089 times)

Offline gillianren

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 2211
    • My Letterboxd journal
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #285 on: February 03, 2015, 03:27:08 PM »
There's also this.  I've said it before, and I'll say it again.  NASA could not pay me enough to lie about history.  I believe lying about history is a sin, a word I don't use very often.  It is our duty and obligation to tell the truth whenever possible.  I wouldn't lie for profit.

Same here.  Lying is not in my DNA.

The thing is, in a way, it very much is in mine.  Bipolar disorder often makes for very good liars; I have a friend who I don't much trust when he says certain things, because I'm pretty sure it's his illness talking, not him.  But I find lying so repulsive on a personal level that I've worked to overcome it.  Oh, there are a few places you shouldn't trust me, but it's mostly when I tell you that I'm totally working on a project that's due tomorrow.  Because I've probably been putting it off until I finish it hurriedly and not very well at the last minute.  However, even then, I really try not to, because it's wrong.
"This sounds like a job for Bipolar Bear . . . but I just can't seem to get out of bed!"

"Conspiracy theories are an irresistible labour-saving device in the face of complexity."  --Henry Louis Gates

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #286 on: February 03, 2015, 03:27:19 PM »
I did not come to this forum  to jump through hoops like a trained poodle.

No, you chose to come and bang a huge empty vessel. So please, enlighten us all with your complicated science.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Bob B.

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
  • Bob the Excel Guru™
    • Rocket & Space Technology
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #287 on: February 03, 2015, 03:28:00 PM »
I did not come to this forum  to jump through hoops like a trained poodle.

Then you've come to the wrong place.  You agreed to the forum rules when you registered and those rules state you must support your claims.  Abide by the rules that you agreed to and present your evidence without further delay.

Offline RAF

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #288 on: February 03, 2015, 03:28:48 PM »
...I have already proved the premise of this thread, as I am sure you are aware.

Was the premise that you are an uneducated troll?

...because that is the only thing you have "proved", here.

Offline JayUtah

  • Neptune
  • ****
  • Posts: 3814
    • Clavius
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #289 on: February 03, 2015, 03:29:07 PM »
No improvement, I see.
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams

Offline Romulus

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
  • BANNED
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #290 on: February 03, 2015, 03:29:22 PM »
There's also this.  I've said it before, and I'll say it again.  NASA could not pay me enough to lie about history.  I believe lying about history is a sin, a word I don't use very often.  It is our duty and obligation to tell the truth whenever possible.  I wouldn't lie for profit.

Same here.  Lying is not in my DNA.

The thing is, in a way, it very much is in mine.  Bipolar disorder often makes for very good liars; I have a friend who I don't much trust when he says certain things, because I'm pretty sure it's his illness talking, not him.  But I find lying so repulsive on a personal level that I've worked to overcome it.  Oh, there are a few places you shouldn't trust me, but it's mostly when I tell you that I'm totally working on a project that's due tomorrow.  Because I've probably been putting it off until I finish it hurriedly and not very well at the last minute.  However, even then, I really try not to, because it's wrong.
If you lie about anything, you will lie about everything.
As for lying not being in my DNA, there seems to be some powerful anecdotal evidence to that effect, but I won't get into that here. Suffice it to say it is my belief that a lie dishonors only myself.

Offline Romulus

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
  • BANNED
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #291 on: February 03, 2015, 03:30:17 PM »
I did not come to this forum  to jump through hoops like a trained poodle.

Then you've come to the wrong place. 

Thank you, that was priceless

Offline Bob B.

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
  • Bob the Excel Guru™
    • Rocket & Space Technology
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #292 on: February 03, 2015, 03:31:08 PM »
No improvement, I see.

Did you expect anything else?

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #293 on: February 03, 2015, 03:31:37 PM »
No improvement, I see.

No. Do I get to invoke the dead parrot sketch?
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Romulus

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
  • BANNED
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #294 on: February 03, 2015, 03:32:13 PM »
No improvement, I see.

Good afternoon, Mr.Windley. Yeah, no change. Your minions are still doing their jobs, attacking my character.

I agreed to move on to the next proof as soon as this one is acknowledged (which you have done) and this hread locked to prevent it being used to attack me as it has been

Offline Romulus

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
  • BANNED
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #295 on: February 03, 2015, 03:33:10 PM »
No improvement, I see.

No. Do I get to invoke the dead parrot sketch?

Funny you should mention the word parrot.

Polly wanna cracker?

Offline RAF

  • Mars
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #296 on: February 03, 2015, 03:33:36 PM »
If you lie about anything, you will lie about everything.

Speaking from experience, no doubt.

Offline Bob B.

  • Jupiter
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
  • Bob the Excel Guru™
    • Rocket & Space Technology
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #297 on: February 03, 2015, 03:33:58 PM »
Thank you, that was priceless

Abide by the rules that you agreed to and the instructions of the moderator and present your evidence that Apollo was faked.

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #298 on: February 03, 2015, 03:34:50 PM »
Your minions are still doing their jobs, attacking my character.

You've been watching too much Despicable Me. Next you'll accuse Jay of trying to steal to Moon, and the members here being in cahoots with him.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Is the Scientific Process, Standards of Proof ignored by NASA Supporters?
« Reply #299 on: February 03, 2015, 03:35:48 PM »
Polly wanna cracker?

No need, I've found plenty in your posts. There's some right crackers. Thanks all the same.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch