Tindarormkimcha's thread

[Luke Pemberton]

It's very hard not to go straight to ridicule of Tindarormkimcha's ridiculousness.  We all know how this will end.

1. 1st warning.
2. Flurry of insults as Tindarormkimcha realises his time left this saloon is short and we witness a fully blown tantrum.
3. Final warning.
4. Flounce or ban hammer?

I'll give you odds at 1 000 000 - 1 on.

[Echnaton]

...

Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
...

You are sadly mistaken

But this is only one point you are in error.

I'd never seen that clip before, so thanks for posting it. 


And while we are making a list, let's not forget the searing radiation hell of the Van Halen Belts.

[Echnaton]

I'll give you odds at 1 000 000 - 1 on.

I'll see you and raise to 1 000 000 000 - 1.

[frenat]

Now, can someone explain to me why so many people here really believe we have sent men to the moon?

I am rather curious why and how people believe this utter nonsense.


So, come on.

Maybe you can convince me, and pull me back in your little cult.

Why?  ALL the facts point to it.  It is completely internally and externally consistent.  It isn't just the photos and videos, but the tracking done by third parties, the samples brought back, the literal warehouses full of data collected from the missions that ALL points to real landings.  In 40+ years, not a single hoax argument has stood up to scrutiny.  In fact, hoaxies often just betray how little they know about the subject.  I've lost track of how many hoax believers still think there should be stars in the photos or how many are not even aware there was more than one landing.

[bknight]

...

Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
...

You are sadly mistaken

But this is only one point you are in error.

I'd never seen that clip before, so thanks for posting it. 


And while we are making a list, let's not forget the searing radiation hell of the Van Halen Belts.

There is another not speeded up

I found this after watching a Marcus Allen video in which he "was just asking" whether an error occurred on the deployment, because he couldn't find it, only the MESA open.  He "asked NASA" whether the rover was deployed on the starboard side.  NASA "never" answered.  lol

[frenat]

Oh and btw the moon is an ARTIFICIAL object.

Do you know what crank magnetism is?

[ineluki]

Do you know what crank magnetism is?

Shimano's next generation of clipless bike pedals?

[Luke Pemberton]

I'll see you and raise to 1 000 000 000 - 1.

Man, I should have known better and not start gambling with a Texan. 

[Tindarormkimcha]

NASA=Numerous Anomalies and Scams Abound.


yes, indeed! or NASA=Never  A Straight Answer.

[Tindarormkimcha]

And so it is.

The pro-Apollo crowd will go to almost any lengths to keep their moonlanding mythology alive.  From misrepresenting opponents’ positions, debunking non-existent claims, presenting arguments they know are invalid (and hoping you don’t), ignoring key arguments and critical evidence, presenting farcical explanations for the numerous photographic and other anomalies, quote mining, bashing opponents’ long-since-corrected mistakes, lodging fraudulent copyright and privacy claims to get videos pulled, using ridicule in place of argument, character assassinations, and – when all else fails – outright lying.  You name it, they’ll do it!

[darren r]

NASA=Numerous Anomalies and Scams Abound.


yes, indeed! or NASA=Never  A Straight Answer.

Prove it.

[Luke Pemberton]

The pro-Apollo crowd will go to almost any lengths to keep their moonlanding mythology alive.  From misrepresenting opponents’ positions, debunking non-existent claims, presenting arguments they know are invalid (and hoping you don’t), ignoring key arguments and critical evidence, presenting farcical explanations for the numerous photographic and other anomalies, quote mining, bashing opponents’ long-since-corrected mistakes, lodging fraudulent copyright and privacy claims to get videos pulled, using ridicule in place of argument, character assassinations, and – when all else fails – outright lying.  You name it, they’ll do it!

Now you've cited Jarrah White. You really have no argument now. The lad can't add up, and he's proven this numerous times.

[JayUtah]

Now you want me to make the error of the logical fallacy of authority.

Nope. I want you to demonstrate you know what you're talking about.  You've referred to a number of concepts you obviously barely understand.  You ask how people can still believe we went to the Moon.  Have you considered it's because they know a whole lot more than you do about how to get to the Moon?

[frenat]

And so it is.

The pro-Apollo crowd will go to almost any lengths to keep their moonlanding mythology alive.  From misrepresenting opponents’ positions, debunking non-existent claims, presenting arguments they know are invalid (and hoping you don’t), ignoring key arguments and critical evidence, presenting farcical explanations for the numerous photographic and other anomalies, quote mining, bashing opponents’ long-since-corrected mistakes, lodging fraudulent copyright and privacy claims to get videos pulled, using ridicule in place of argument, character assassinations, and – when all else fails – outright lying.  You name it, they’ll do it!

that's funny since you've been asked multiple times to present your proof and have yet to show anything.

[JayUtah]

NASA=Numerous Anomalies and Scams Abound.

yes, indeed! or NASA=Never  A Straight Answer.

Sorry, "mate," this isn't YouTube.  Puerile name-calling gets you nowhere.  You're expected to actually show some substance.