Author Topic: Tindarormkimcha's thread  (Read 132926 times)

Offline 12oh2alarm

  • Venus
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • This dude likes Don Martin cartoons.
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #90 on: July 28, 2015, 04:55:01 AM »
Parallel shadows, secondary light sources, wires and altered film speed?
  • I can see the guilt in their face!
This particular one always amazed me. Being able to recognize guilt by looking at a picture or clip of someone. The justice system would be so much more efficient if we could count on people with this capability.

"Shall we fry this person on Old Sparky or is he not guilty?"
"Lets see whether our oracle gives his thumbs up or down."

Back to the ancient Romans and their circus? Better not. Don't mistake a tired and frustrated look for not being at the control stick of a flying machine for guilt.

Offline darren r

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #91 on: July 28, 2015, 05:07:55 AM »
I doubt very VERY much if our little "mate" has anything of substance behind his bluster. His natural home will be on YouTube, so he's completely out of his depth here.

Tinda, me old mucker, here's a list that you might want to use.
  • No stars
  • No blast crater
  • Rockets won't work in a vacuum
  • Deadly radiation
  • Fluttering flags
  • Camera film would burn
  • Re-entry wouldn't work

Knock yourself out.

Parallel shadows, secondary light sources, wires and altered film speed?

The L(E)M is made of cardboard and tinfoil!
Who shot the film of Armstrong leaving the lander?
Who shot the film of the lander leaving the Moon?
Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
Why haven't we been back?
The spacesuits wouldn't work!
" I went to the God D**n Moon!" Byng Gordon, 8th man on the Moon.

Offline Luke Pemberton

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
  • Chaos in his tin foil hat
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #92 on: July 28, 2015, 05:20:06 AM »
The L(E)M is made of cardboard and tinfoil!
Who shot the film of Armstrong leaving the lander?
Who shot the film of the lander leaving the Moon?
Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
Why haven't we been back?
The spacesuits wouldn't work!

Where are the moon rocks?
C-rock?
Punk rock?
Rock and roll?
The Russians were sold grain?
The data feeds were pre-scripted tapes and were transmitted from relay satellites orbiting the Moon?
The lunar surface was too hot to walk on?
The film would be damaged by radiation?
They couldn't take that many photographs?
The lunar rover didn't form perfect rooster tails?
Aldrin's boot print was impossible.

Take your pick Tindarormkimcha.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein.

I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people – Sir Isaac Newton.

A polar orbit would also bypass the SAA - Tim Finch

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #93 on: July 28, 2015, 05:34:55 AM »
Now, can someone explain to me why so many people here really believe we have sent men to the moon?

Because the evidence proves it beyond any reasonable doubt.

if that isn't quit some spectacular circular reasoning, i don't know what is.

In essence you are only saying:

it is true because it is true.


How about some real spectacular logic, mate?!

Offline smartcooky

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1968
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #94 on: July 28, 2015, 05:40:22 AM »
What I pray for is an intellectually honest HB.

Do you know what an oxymoron is?
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Offline onebigmonkey

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1607
  • ALSJ Clown
    • Apollo Hoax Debunked
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #95 on: July 28, 2015, 05:40:44 AM »
Now, can someone explain to me why so many people here really believe we have sent men to the moon?

Because the evidence proves it beyond any reasonable doubt.

if that isn't quit some spectacular circular reasoning, i don't know what is.

In essence you are only saying:

it is true because it is true.


How about some real spectacular logic, mate?!

Not what he said.

Pick one piece of evidence, start a thread on it and employ some logic of your own.

Otherwise obvious troll is obvious.

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #96 on: July 28, 2015, 05:41:46 AM »
The L(E)M is made of cardboard and tinfoil!
Who shot the film of Armstrong leaving the lander?
Who shot the film of the lander leaving the Moon?
Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
Why haven't we been back?
The spacesuits wouldn't work!

Where are the moon rocks?
C-rock?
Punk rock?
Rock and roll?
The Russians were sold grain?
The data feeds were pre-scripted tapes and were transmitted from relay satellites orbiting the Moon?
The lunar surface was too hot to walk on?
The film would be damaged by radiation?
They couldn't take that many photographs?
The lunar rover didn't form perfect rooster tails?
Aldrin's boot print was impossible.

Take your pick Tindarormkimcha.

You are funny, but ah well, let's pick the moon rocks! It has been proven they are faked! right?

Offline smartcooky

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1968
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #97 on: July 28, 2015, 05:42:18 AM »
In essence you are only saying:

it is true because it is true.

No, he's saying its true because THE EVIDENCE supports it.

If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #98 on: July 28, 2015, 05:43:48 AM »
Now, can someone explain to me why so many people here really believe we have sent men to the moon?

Because the evidence proves it beyond any reasonable doubt.

if that isn't quit some spectacular circular reasoning, i don't know what is.

In essence you are only saying:

it is true because it is true.


How about some real spectacular logic, mate?!

Not what he said.

Pick one piece of evidence, start a thread on it and employ some logic of your own.

Otherwise obvious troll is obvious.

if you don't see the circular reasoning in thuis, then the one trolling is you, mate.



wow what a cult this is. how much to become a member? 100 prayings?

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #99 on: July 28, 2015, 05:44:35 AM »
In essence you are only saying:

it is true because it is true.

No, he's saying its true because THE EVIDENCE supports it.

yep, as I said, CR! Come ó now. pray to the hollow moon

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #100 on: July 28, 2015, 05:45:47 AM »
Oh and btw the moon is an ARTIFICIAL object.



Offline onebigmonkey

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1607
  • ALSJ Clown
    • Apollo Hoax Debunked
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #101 on: July 28, 2015, 05:46:35 AM »
The L(E)M is made of cardboard and tinfoil!
Who shot the film of Armstrong leaving the lander?
Who shot the film of the lander leaving the Moon?
Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
Why haven't we been back?
The spacesuits wouldn't work!

Where are the moon rocks?
C-rock?
Punk rock?
Rock and roll?
The Russians were sold grain?
The data feeds were pre-scripted tapes and were transmitted from relay satellites orbiting the Moon?
The lunar surface was too hot to walk on?
The film would be damaged by radiation?
They couldn't take that many photographs?
The lunar rover didn't form perfect rooster tails?
Aldrin's boot print was impossible.

Take your pick Tindarormkimcha.

You are funny, but ah well, let's pick the moon rocks! It has been proven they are faked! right?

Wrong.

Please tell us who has proved them fake, how, when, using what methods. Try and do it without copying and pasting.

Next.

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #102 on: July 28, 2015, 05:46:56 AM »
Now, why don't we adress the fakery of the moon rocks here?

Offline Tindarormkimcha

  • Earth
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #103 on: July 28, 2015, 05:48:06 AM »
The L(E)M is made of cardboard and tinfoil!
Who shot the film of Armstrong leaving the lander?
Who shot the film of the lander leaving the Moon?
Why is there no film or photos of the 'Moon buggy/jeep' being deployed?
Why haven't we been back?
The spacesuits wouldn't work!

Where are the moon rocks?
C-rock?
Punk rock?
Rock and roll?
The Russians were sold grain?
The data feeds were pre-scripted tapes and were transmitted from relay satellites orbiting the Moon?
The lunar surface was too hot to walk on?
The film would be damaged by radiation?
They couldn't take that many photographs?
The lunar rover didn't form perfect rooster tails?
Aldrin's boot print was impossible.

Take your pick Tindarormkimcha.

You are funny, but ah well, let's pick the moon rocks! It has been proven they are faked! right?

Wrong.

Please tell us who has proved them fake, how, when, using what methods. Try and do it without copying and pasting.

Next.

Wrong? we'll see.

Well, you don't seem very open minded btw don't you read newspapers? it even was in the newspapers!

Offline smartcooky

  • Uranus
  • ****
  • Posts: 1968
Re: Re: A few simple questions for conspiracy theorists
« Reply #104 on: July 28, 2015, 05:50:10 AM »
The sock puppet is just trolling. Its not even making a pretence of backing up claims with evidence, just repeating the same old tired, thoroughly debunked rubbish we've all heard before.

I am really saddened by the declining standard of HBs we get these days. There use to at least be a few who were articulate and were a challenge to debate with. This one is both illiterate and ignorant. We know its going to be banned eventually, why not save the time and effort, and just ban it now!
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong.