Still wondering why you continue to pursue this to such extreme unreasonable lengths when anybody can see that a test of this sort will never satisfy you despite what you say.
I think or at least used to think that it was the quick route to the much more important Independent 9-11 investigation.
I'm bewildered by the level of resistance from educated men. It's a simple thing. A validation.
Although I understand the fear that NASA can't validate its claim.
And that's what would lead to 9-11 truth.
If it was revealed that the government lied big about NASA, people would be more agreeable to confronting the harder truth about 9-11.
And you're wrong. The test before independent witnesses would satisfy me. I'm sick of this subject and want it settled.
Arrogant nonsense - everyone who disagrees with me is wrong, you are too frightened to admit the truth blah blah blah.
Maybe you should check out the beam in your own eye and examine your own motives in the context of your little rant there.
Shock news: I am not defending Apollo missions out of fear. I am not defending Apollo out of blind belief or defence of a government that is nothing to do with me. I am not desperately clinging on to some thin raft of world constructs that will tumble like a house of cards if some lone jumped up internet warrior with a vastly over-inflated sense of their own importance inversely proportional to their ability to read a book and understand its contents says I'm wrong.
I defend Apollo to stop a great achievement being denigrated by morons and idiots. I defend it because I know it is a genuine historical event, and I know it because I have put the hours in doing my own research and validating evidence, and because I can see that every piece of information about the programme presents a coherent and consistent narrative supported by scientific fact.
What have you done apart from bluster and sneer?
Where is your empirically proven scientifically validated evidence that a sublimator will not cool a space suit?
