The odds are realy[sic] against the idea the we have sent men to the moon.
"The odds" implies a quantitative claim. What is your probability figure, and exactly how did you calculate it?
I once believed that fairy tail[sic], but now I am sure it was (and is) one big gigantic hoax.
You have waved your hands about radiation and petrified wood and so on, but all of these topics have been repeatedly examined, in detail, on this board and its predecessors. You clearly have not examined the Apollo record in any detail. Why, then, is either your alleged prior belief, or your current disbelief, worthy of any particular attention?
So now I wonder why people still believe in this non-sense,
In my case, it's because I'm an experienced space systems engineer, with a space physics background, have worked with Apollo engineers, and have examined the record in reasonable detail.
while there is no evidence we have ever send[sic] men to the moon!
Good heavens, whatever gave you such a silly idea? The Apollo program, including its manned and unmanned predecessors, and its scientific and technical legacy, is the most heavily documented engineering program ever. There is an enormous amount of design, test, and operational information readily available, not to mention science telemetry, lunar samples, peer-reviewed research, imagery, test and flight hardware, and follow-on technical and operational heritage. You're simply trying to deny things you're not even dimly aware of.
What are your intentions by starting this thread? Do you want to just call people names and assert knowledge you don't actually have? Or would you like to actually
learn something? If the former, you may provoke people into retaliating, but you can't bluff your way here. If the latter, you will find a number of knowledgeable people willing to help you.
Which would you rather do? Strut and pose, or learn something?
