So Dr. Zheng emailed me back at his JPL address.
He does still believe the mission was a hoax. Here is his exact email to me:
Yes, but what I found was that the video was a faked ‘live cast’, there still exists a possibility that they faked the video (for fear of broadcast a failure) while actually did perform the EVA—we don’t know.
I am sure the video was faked because I did orbital analysis with SZ-7 and compared the scene in the ‘live video’ and found many inconsistencies, e.g. the spacecraft was actually flying over a land while the ‘live video’ showed ocean on its camera (pointing backward of its moving direction).
Sorry I don’t have time for now to explain the details, but if you are interested I could later send you my communications with a friend on this. If you happen to be an amateur radio /astronomy fan you could do the orbital analysis yourself. The orbital parameters (TLE) can be downloaded from http://www.space-track.org/ , the catalogue number for SZ-7 is 33386.
-Dr. Qu Zheng.
I got his permission to use his statements in my argument. There. A named expert for you. And I'm willing to bet there are many...many more out there that simply aren't saying anything.
So essentially, your"expert" failed to support several of your statements.
I'm really convinced Shenzhou 7 was not real.
Not supported, you expert says that "perhaps they actually did perform the EVA—we don’t know."
Speeding the footage up would cause everything to look like it was not underwater.
Your contention that it was or might have been shot under water then manipulated to make it appear to be in space was refuted by your expert who believes the video was "a faked ‘live cast.’ "
Finally, you have only established your expert as an "expert" by the fact he has a JPL email address. Hardly convincing. I have, at various times, had university email addresses, none of which, nor the education received at the schools, make me an expert on anything.
Your "expert" doesn't leave you with much to work with.
