Ok sorry for annoying you ChrLz I did not mean to.
You didn't annoy me, CC. It takes a whole lot more than that - I was just digging a little to ensure you weren't another incarnation of our most frequent troll.. I hope there are no hard feelings.
I am actually 13 so give me a little space for my spelling error.
No problem!
I am actually really good at spelling (two years ahead) but I could not fit an extra s in because there was not enough space to do so.
May I suggest you could have dropped the "This sign up is .." and the college bit? Just "For my Assessment in Science" would have worked nicely.. I'm still interested in your assessment - why not tell us a bit more about it?
But with the word astronaut that was an error because I did not know how to spell it.
Unfortunately that particular misspelling (or one very like it) is often used by trolls to insult astronauts, so you can probably see why I was suspicious..
I have researched other websites so I am more informed on the subject. I will not ask any more questions unless completely necessary.
That's great to hear - but don't hesitate to to ask questions if you are finding something difficult to understand.
The most important thing of all is to realise that the lunar environment that the astronauts were in was VERY, VERY different to Earth, and some things that you might think are either strange or indicators of fakery, are in fact the result of the nature of that environment.
In the case of this visibility of stars issue.. earlier i asked you to think about why you can't see stars in daytime on earth. That question is absolutely key to understanding what is going on. You may also wish to investigate things like the camera exposures required to image stars, and compare them to the camera settings required for daylit scenery (which is what were used for the majority of the Apollo images - it's all documented).
After you've done all that, you may begin to wonder (correctly) how anyone could seriously put up websites claiming that the lack of visible stars in Apollo images is a pointer to fakery. It is in fact just a pointer to complete ignorance - indeed the nature of those images (in this and many other aspects)
proves that they were taken in an airless, fully sunlit, 1/6G environment. AKA the Moon.
By the way I am not lying and I actually believe that we did land on the moon so I got nothing against you. Sorry for the unintentional inconvenience it will not occur again.
Like I said, please don't be put off posting here - if you come with an open mind and a willingness to learn, there are many very highly educated and experienced folks who can help you sort it all out. And then there's me..
