That is simply not true. Armstrong was a recluse who appeared to be highly reluctant to represent NASA, and he very seldom spoke of being on the moon.
That's according to one conspiracy author who complained that Armstrong was reluctant to see him.
Site a reference to Armstrong pontificating about the moonlandings
The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.
Mr. Windley, you will have to excuse me for being blunt, but you are a horrible liar. The "surface journal" was required to be attributed to Armstrong because if it didn't exist the hoax would be obvious. Armstrong resigned from NASA a few years after the 'moonlandings" and refused to discuss the moon landings with ANYONE. He was virtual recluse who valued his privacy and when he did make public appearances he didn't discuss Apollo. He worked as a professor and didn't allow his students to treat him any different than anyone else. He abhorred the attention and showed all the signs of being a man with integrity unwilling to participate in a lie.
Or, just maybe, he wasn't an egomaniac looking for praise. Maybe, just maybe, he wanted an orderly classroom environment that benefited his students, without the distraction of his fame.
I am curious about you, though. Why is this so important to you? And, please, because I'm really interested in your motives, why Jay in particular?
Finally, give me, as a pilot, just one piece of evidence that will help make your case, or at least begin building it. Anything at all.
