I really wonder why people still believe we have send men to the moon.

[Tindarormkimcha]

while there is no evidence

One simple question for you. What exactly do you consider evidence to be? If you cannot or will not answer that simple question there really is no point in further discussion.

Simple, evidence that is not faked! There is, very simply, none!



Now, back tou you. what do you consider evidence and why?

[Tindarormkimcha]

(though if I told you, you'd probably cry "fake")

try me or are you a coward?

[Tindarormkimcha]

And why does nobody here goes into this:

Let me put it another way, why do a  lot of people here  blindly accept the 'evidence' ?

A question I have asked earlier.


Can't do, or what?

[Tindarormkimcha]

If you think that's some form of compliment, think again!

I m not realy interested in compliments, mate!

Why bring these Ad Hominems up again and again?

It let's you look so desperate.





Now I ask again, why do people still BELIEVE  we have sent men to the moon?


Documentation? That one is hilarious! Did you know there is a huge documentation about Star Trek! Does that make them real? No, of course not! It is not a valid argument.

[Abaddon]

Quick question, Tindarormkimcha, how do you know the Van Allen Belts even exist? You say they would be too dangerous to pass through, but can you see them from down here on Earth? How do you know anything about them?

yes you are right here:

However:



https://www.testofbelievers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/VanAllenBelts-SciAm-Mar1959.pdf

Then look up, this article, page 39

Radiation Belts around the Earth

Instruments borne aloft by artificial satellites and lunar probes
indicate that our planet is encircled by two zones of high-energy
particles, against which space travelers will have to be shielded

by James A. Van Allen

And the Apollo craft were shielded. Did you have a point?

And the article you cited is from 1959. Do you think science just stopped at that point?

And James Van Allen himself stated that such HB claims are baloney. Why do you ignore that?

[Abaddon]

while there is no evidence

One simple question for you. What exactly do you consider evidence to be? If you cannot or will not answer that simple question there really is no point in further discussion.

Simple, evidence that is not faked! There is, very simply, none!

How were the rocks faked?

[Tedward]

Now I ask again, why do people still BELIEVE  we have sent men to the moon?

Quite simply the evidence and one you can trace its evolution and check the provenance.

You can try to dance around it and play silly word games, as is all you are doing anyway, but I predict this. You will not now or ever bring anything to the table, other than word games, that will present me with enough information to change my mind.

That there is the bit you need to focus on, disproving what is there. You will not and cannot do that.

Other than that, keep stirring, it was rather amusing but getting a bit same old now, wonder what forum you are giggling to your compadres over this?

[Jason Thompson]

Simple, evidence that is not faked!

That is not an answer, it is a given. Thank you for demonstrating your inability or unwillingness to take any of this remotely seriously. Now tell us why we should waste our time on you.

[Tindarormkimcha]

And the Apollo craft were shielded. Did you have a point?

No, they were not properly shielded.

And the article you cited is from 1959. Do you think science just stopped at that point?

No, but it seems the space missions have!!
Glad you bring that nonsense up.
First they went to the moon, allegedley, then
they stay UNDER  the Radiation Belt for years and years and years.
That is backwards, isn'it ? It is all soo hilarious to say the least.

And James Van Allen himself stated that such HB claims are baloney. Why do you ignore that?

O yeah, that stupid one always comes up!
Are you aware that he started to say that when he started to work for the liars of   nasa?
Hmm they pay him , don't they? Hmmm and they created the moon hoax!
That is telling us something, isn't it?

[Miss Vocalcord]

Then look up, this article, page 39

Sorry that is a document, according to yourself that is not valid evidence; now please try again and explain why you think the van Allen belts even exist.

[Tindarormkimcha]

Now I ask again, why do people still BELIEVE  we have sent men to the moon?

Quite simply the evidence and one you can trace its evolution and check the provenance.

You can try to dance around it and play silly word games, as is all you are doing anyway, but I predict this. You will not now or ever bring anything to the table, other than word games, that will present me with enough information to change my mind.

That there is the bit you need to focus on, disproving what is there. You will not and cannot do that.

Other than that, keep stirring, it was rather amusing but getting a bit same old now, wonder what forum you are giggling to your compadres over this?

So, you really can't answer the question?

[Tindarormkimcha]

Then look up, this article, page 39

Sorry that is a document, according to yourself that is not valid evidence; now please try again and explain why you think the van Allen belts even exist.

O I do agree with you here!!!!

As far as I am concerned I don't believe anything mainstream, including this one!

So, yea, you are right!

it is just that some people need this mainstream nonsense.



So, no poblem here,

Now we agree that documents don't proof a thing!

That one is out of the way now



Thanks mate! I mean that.




Now, is there any other evidence?

Of course not!


Just take a photograph!

WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT IT IS TAKEN ON THE MOON?

There is NO PROOF

It is really take on FAITH.

[Miss Vocalcord]

Now we agree that documents don't proof a thing!

No we don't; you say a document doesn't proof a thing, not me.

So now please explain why you think the van Allen Belts do exist.

[Jason Thompson]

What, to you, does prove an event happened? And don't say 'evidence that is not faked'. What is evidence that is not faked? How do you distinguish it from evidence that is faked?

[Tindarormkimcha]

Now we agree that documents don't proof a thing!

No we don't; you say a document doesn't proof a thing, not me.

So now please explain why you think the van Allen Belts do exist.

oh boy oh boy

You really don't read my postings, now do you?



Yep, I will tell you again

Read carefully now, boy.


DOCUMENTS DON'T PROOF A THING!

If you really think they do, please be so kind and explain why? Thank you.