What, to you, does prove an event happened? And don't say 'evidence that is not faked'. What is evidence that is not faked? How do you distinguish it from evidence that is faked?
DOCUMENTS DON'T PROOF A THING!
Quote from: Tindarormkimcha on October 01, 2015, 07:14:38 AMDOCUMENTS DON'T PROOF A THING!Then why did you use a document to talk about the van Allen belts? So now you are saying you don't have any evidence for the existence of the van Allen belts?
Read very carefully now, "boy" - this will "proof" everything you need to know about who is posting under the name Tindarormkimcha...
That is not answering my question. Please answer it before you try turning it back on me, or must I assume you don't actually have an answer? How do you determine what evidence is fake and what is not?
So, You do indeed NOT read all my postings! Go back and re-read.
No, they were not properly shielded.
Quote from: Tindarormkimcha on October 01, 2015, 07:23:09 AMSo, You do indeed NOT read all my postings! Go back and re-read.Your claim:Quote from: Tindarormkimcha on October 01, 2015, 07:03:41 AMNo, they were not properly shielded.Shielded against what?
QuoteIf you are going to launch an artificial sputnik, then it is advisable to make it holiow. Atthe same time it would be naive to imagine that anyone capable of such a tremendousspace project would be satisfied simply with some kind of giant empty trunk hurledinto near-Earth trajectory.It is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship, the interior ofwhich was filied with fuel for the engines, materials and appliances for repair work,navigation instruments, observation equipment and ali manner of machinery ... inother words, everything necessary to enable this 'caravelie of the Universe' to serve as aNoah's Ark of inteliigence, perhaps even as the home of a whole civilisation envisaginga prolonged (thousands of miliions of years) existence and long wanderings throughspace (thousands of millions of miles).Naturaliy, the huli of such a spaceship must be super-tough in order to stand up to theblows of meteorites and sharp fluctuations between extreme heat and extreme cold.Probably the sheIi is a double-layered affair - the basis a dark armouring of about 20miles in thickness, and outside it some kind of more loosely-packed covering (a thinnerlayer - averaging about three miles). In certain areas - where the lunar 'seas' and'craters' are, the upper layer is quite thin, in some cases, non-existent.Sputnik magazine
If you are going to launch an artificial sputnik, then it is advisable to make it holiow. Atthe same time it would be naive to imagine that anyone capable of such a tremendousspace project would be satisfied simply with some kind of giant empty trunk hurledinto near-Earth trajectory.It is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship, the interior ofwhich was filied with fuel for the engines, materials and appliances for repair work,navigation instruments, observation equipment and ali manner of machinery ... inother words, everything necessary to enable this 'caravelie of the Universe' to serve as aNoah's Ark of inteliigence, perhaps even as the home of a whole civilisation envisaginga prolonged (thousands of miliions of years) existence and long wanderings throughspace (thousands of millions of miles).Naturaliy, the huli of such a spaceship must be super-tough in order to stand up to theblows of meteorites and sharp fluctuations between extreme heat and extreme cold.Probably the sheIi is a double-layered affair - the basis a dark armouring of about 20miles in thickness, and outside it some kind of more loosely-packed covering (a thinnerlayer - averaging about three miles). In certain areas - where the lunar 'seas' and'craters' are, the upper layer is quite thin, in some cases, non-existent.
And what exactly have I no clue about there, mr mindreader?
