I really wonder why people still believe we have send men to the moon.

[Bob B.]

Cant; you read, mate=

I asked for details, so far you haven't given any.

[Peter B]

We don't need to rely on NASA alone.

But you do.

What do you mean? I provided three examples where we don't rely on NASA alone, and you chose to respond to those examples.

1. The Soviet Union accepted the reality of the landings. Are you going to say that at the height of the Cold War, when the propaganda value for demonstrating NASA faked the landings would have been huge, the Soviets couldn't be bothered? Or are you going to say the Cold War was faked too?

yes, and not only that, the whole spoetnik thing was faked as well!

Just to clarify, you're saying the entire Cold War was faked, and Sputnik was faked as well? What about other space missions? Do you believe any spacecraft are in space?

2. Scientists from around the world have studied the Apollo rocks: dozens of scientific papers on every rock. Not one of these scientists has found any evidence that the rocks are anything other than Moon rocks - chemically they're too different from Earth rocks to be Earth rocks. Are they all mistaken or lying? Or do they know what they're talking about.

Make the lie big enough..... ( A.Hitler)

And how do you say that was applied here? How have thousands of scientists from around the world been convinced to lie for 40+ years?

3. Ham radio operators from around the world listened in to the Apollo spacecraft. Swede Sven Grahn is one example who's put his information on the Internet. Was he mistaken or lying? Or did he know what he was doing?

Very interesting one! I don't know yet about this one. But I will look into that. Thanks!

Thank you.

[Bob B.]

And still.....no evidence has been shown that we have send men to the moon.

The evidence is all the stuff you're claiming is fake.  If there were NO evidence then you wouldn't have anything to do.

[bknight]

Time to call it a day.

It is very late overhere.


And still.....no evidence has been shown that we have send men to the moon.




Maybe tomorrow?

And still no evidence that men did not land on the moon.

[Bob B.]

Tindarormkimcha, this is the way it works.  NASA submits their evidence, which has been done.  It includes imagery, documents, testimony, samples, etc.  Then, if somebody thinks it's fake, they put the evidence to the test to try to prove it is faked.  When those tests fail, the default position is that the evidence is authentic.

So the ball is in your court, prove that the evidence is fake.  So far you have only claimed it to be fake.

[DD Brock]

Because it has survived all attempts to prove it fake.

No it didn't. You might BELIEVE it did.That is a different story, eh?

Now I have a question for you, Tindarormkimcha.  In your opinion, what is it about a manned moon landing that prevented NASA from doing it.

So much. Too dangerous,too complex, the rocket was way too small.and so on and so forth.

It is all hilarious if you look at the fake photos etc.



But eh, I love a good laugh!

Do you suppose you are ever going to get around to backing that claim up, or are you just going to continue running your mouth?

[dwight]

Mate, I think this hoaxer's visit reminds me of a rager of a christmas party, where copious amounts of alcohol have been cosnumed. Where you experience the party as flashes of lights, loud music, and many varied moments of weirdness, followed by a fist fight - only to wake up after all the people have gone, nursing a cracking hangover and wondering what the hell just happened.

[JayUtah]

Mate, I think this hoaxer's visit reminds me of a rager of a christmas party...

Indeed, I've never seen anyone who can close his eyes and stick his fingers in his ears for 19 whole pages.  Screaming "No, that's fake!" over and over again is funny for about five pages.  Now it's just sad.

[gillianren]

It is soo funny to see people o edit the information so it fits within their religion.

My Gods, you don't even know what "edit" means.

[Tedward]

Think the intention was clear, he/she is on a fishing expedition and getting the bites.

He/she will never present evidence, cannot and will not.

Starve the fire.

[Tindarormkimcha]

can't sleep yet. so, for a short litle while...


What a lot of hogwash again.

Anyway, now it is clear that the rock with the "c" is indeed a prop and fake. we can continue

Let start with the Van Allen Belts.

Here a lot of circular reasoning is used. Like 'they went to the moon, so the must have passed the Van Allen Belt."

Yes, sure. And some even don't see how flawed that 'logic' is!

[Tindarormkimcha]

How hilarious the whole nasa company is!

What's keeping us from Mars? Space rays, say experts
http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/04/01/us-space-radiation-idUSN3139657820080401

[frenat]

can't sleep yet. so, for a short litle while...


What a lot of hogwash again.

Anyway, now it is clear that the rock with the "c" is indeed a prop and fake. we can continue

You still haven't proven it is a prop.  You STILL have to provide evidence of official photos from BEFORE the magazine was published, AND evidence that movie sets label props that way.  You have FAILED in both respects.

[frenat]

How hilarious the whole nasa company is!

What's keeping us from Mars? Space rays, say experts
http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/04/01/us-space-radiation-idUSN3139657820080401

Why?  Because they know that a longer mission such as to Mars, would result in far more exposure?

[Tindarormkimcha]

can't sleep yet. so, for a short litle while...


What a lot of hogwash again.

Anyway, now it is clear that the rock with the "c" is indeed a prop and fake. we can continue

You still haven't proven it is a prop.  You STILL have to provide evidence of official photos from BEFORE the magazine was published, AND evidence that movie sets label props that way.  You have FAILED in both respects.

You just want to think whatever you wan to think.
You only want it all in line with your religion or BELIEF system.

what else is new, mate?

You just don't 'grok' it.


btw that is okay with me.