Videotic?New word! I claim it. It's mine. You all saw it here first...
Two of my other contributions to the English language: "insaniac" and "disastrophe".
Quote from: raven on September 27, 2012, 07:31:24 PMTo me it looks more like it is being obscured by flying debris.There were a number of insulation blankets atop the descent stage, ostensibly to help absorb, diffuse, and deflect the APS plume. They didn't want it rebounding and damaging the underside of the descent stage, so they made sure there was a lot of crinkly stuff under it to disrupt the fluid flow. It looks like a lot of that blanket film ended up snagged in the plume deflectors, and it may be creating false outlines.I love this particular clip also for the "no plume" naysayers. At the "Pitchover!" call you can look directly up the APS nozzle skirt (giggle) and see into the APS thrust chamber where it is most distinctly glowing. While we don't expect the plume to remain incandescent after it exits, there is every expectation it should incandesce while in the thrust chamber. And we have photographic proof of it.
To me it looks more like it is being obscured by flying debris.
They'll just say it was a light bulb.
Quote from: Glom on October 02, 2012, 10:06:38 AMThey'll just say it was a light bulb.It was. A hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide powered light bulb.
I think you're mixing light bulb up with candle.
Candles don't burn in vacuum.
Quote from: Glom on October 04, 2012, 02:16:12 PMI think you're mixing light bulb up with candle.Candles don't burn in vacuum.
It was. A hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide powered light bulb.