And you really don't see the hindsight? Come on...
See it like this. The MLH perspective is that "this was faked" (i.e. a magic show). So the "believer" says to me "well smarty pants, how did he trick us?" And so I suggest something - then the believer says "but that wouldn't work because of XYZ" -- and so then I respond ... "well them maybe it was ABC..."... and so on.
If deliberate trickery is happening - we can only guess at what they might have done or said.
Given that there STILL exists no viable comprehensive hypothesis for the 8 flag motions -- I'm guessing at "how they might have faked it" and am allowed to change my guesses as they are challenged. Without a challenger, I'd be in a fruitless boring echo chamber.
You can't say "but you changed your guess!" - as any form of proof. It just means "I adjusted it based upon your feedback"... etc. This is how it's supposed to work. We are trying to figure out how the magician might have done his trick as he "apparently broke physics".