The LMP depressurisarion phase is given as 13 minutes. Actual depressurisarion was much shorter.
Secondly, you seem to be arguing that a directional air movement was more than capable of either rotating the flag completely on its pole or making it oscillate back and forth. Why is such a thing not possible with directional air movement from a depressurising LM? An air movement coinciding precisely with the LM depressurising, and with recordings made elsewhere on the landing site.
Finally, movement of the flag independent of human contact was observed numerous times after RCS hot fires. The only difference is that the actual movement was not recorded, just the 'before and after' parts.
How long was the cabin depressurization? Do they ever say?
My math assumed 7 lbs (112 ounces) expelled over 112 seconds, just under 2 minutes. 1 oz/sec of Oxygen emitted at 5 PSI from 8 meters away doesn't seem to have enough mass to move a flag, and much less the whole pole - -and even less - to make the pole have so much momentum that it does a 360 (thus comes back) - has enough momentum to turn the last 180 degrees all by itself?? (and against the breeze?)
===
MLH theory does not require moving the pole at all.. the flag is just BARELY OFFSCREEN - for many minutes, you can see the smallest scant sliver of it. And then for fairly brief durations we see this flag cloth PUSHED TOWARDS the LM, and then it subsides back to just barely offscreen.
Here's Jet Wintzer's link to the footage, as the footage that should be there from NASA's Surface Journal is conveniently (for NASA) missing.
https://youtu.be/p_66cqMQsW4?t=207As you can see here, starting at 3:27 - top right side, you can see the tiniest sliver of flag for quite some time before it "blows on screen".
When it blows on screen, note the slant at top (that makes the top white strip mostly hidden).. this is an indicator that the flag is blowing away from the horizontal pole.
This is all there is to the MLH theory here -- slight steady draft - barely moves flag. But since it's barely off screen, it highlights the motion for us very well.
The PNA theory of "spinning a 360" or "pendulum motion" are non-sense.
The first 2 instances occur here, at 1:29 mark:
https://youtu.be/p_66cqMQsW4?t=87(this first one is clearly not a pendulum action)
(the 2nd one cannot possibly be 360 full rotation action)
This is a REAL STUMPER for Pro-Apollo Faith. There exists No Legitimate Way to explain this one away.