Here's a question that surely is relevant: Is there even one regular in this forum that takes the position that Apollo was a fabrication/hoax.
This domain name originated with a hoax claimant who invited people here to debate him on the subject. After a year or so of patient discussion and questinon, he actually changed his mind and agreed there was little credible evidence to support the hoax. We've had quite a few hoax proponent regulars over the years.
Do you just wait for someone like me to come along so you can congratulate each other?
The forum exists for no reason other than to entertain discussion and debate on the authenticity of the Apollo missions. That purpose is not served by having only one side of the question represented. While we have had, over the ten years or so of the domain's existence, a number of webmasters and a number of long-time hoax proponents, there are not presently any regulars who advocate a hoax. Most "melt down" rather quickly and go elsewhere.
You're quite welcome to stay as long as you want and debate Apollo as best you can. But frankly you don't seem as interested in the facts of Apollo as you do in trying to shame people who disagree with you. Since
that is not allowed, I predict you'll soon be banned.
I mean aside from those paid for doing this.
Who is being paid to post here, and how do you know that?
No answer? Ah, didn't think so. You're desperate to find some other reason why people disagree with you and dispute you. As others have pointed out, you are entirely unable to deal with the possibility that there is informed disagreement and opposition to your belief. You have to fabricate other reasons, rather than face the possibility of being mistaken.
What a fine little [vulgar reference] you all have going.
I see you are unable to remain civil. Contrary to your insinuations, the inability to comport oneself as an adult is usually why people are asked to leave this forum. Can you explain why hoax claimants invariably turn to childish language and insults? Is it so they invite moderator intervention and can then go elsewhere and claim they were sanctioned "for their beliefs?"